is
Research Software Engineering
(Notes: Finish technical bit with a description of what this allows other people to do - allows other people to re-run (some) of our analysis. This is how we’ve made the paper - what does this mean for another researcher who comes to this work - they can rerun these aspects completely. But bbox placed by a human - someone could explore how variation in placement of bbox affected results, could rerun and compare. A new experiment, using our paper, updating our paper. Another potential novel contribution, from the same toolchain.
Don’t need to talk about the value of cointainerisation - talk more about the value of making the paper.
Under the current publishing model - the publication is static. One of the potential benefits is moving away from one-shot papers.
Gives us extra stuff, but how many reviewers will build pipeline. Probably not many. The value is improving the research (incremental) process; causes us to reflect on the publication model. What we can’t do with (most) standard journals is publish an almost identical looking paper, but with a different data-set.
Doing this because it’s the right thing to do, but what’s the value in it? Not possible to build these papers without RSEs Old model - one thinks of something, writes software. Stops. Write paper This approach blends this through; no gap between software and paper - same process. The paper is almost software.
)